
Following the publication of the ‘Epstein files’, a wave of sensational claims emerged in the public domain regarding the possible use of cryptocurrencies in illicit schemes. There is a hypothesis that cryptocurrency may have been used to pay for illegal services as part of Epstein’s activities. Experts who have examined the documents claim that the reality is far more complex – more horrific and sensational than rumours, pseudo-experts and the tabloid press suggest.
The ‘Epstein Files’ are a vast collection of materials, documents, correspondence and financial records gathered as part of investigations into financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was convicted of sexual offences. Although the names of crypto exchange founders and well-known crypto investors are not mentioned in the files that have been made public, it is known that at least 550 pages were fully or partially redacted with the aim of concealing names.
The documents feature well-known businessmen and financiers working within the traditional financial system from countries such as France, Norway, Israel, Poland, Canada and Germany. From the published investigation data alone, it is known that the most frequently mentioned figures are from the arts and politics in the US (Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Stacey Plaskett), the UK (Prince Andrew, Peter Mandelson) and Slovakia (Miroslav Lajčák). Many of those implicated have found themselves at the centre of scandals, have already lost their posts, or are under investigation.
New leaks of classified information reveal that Jeffrey Edward Epstein was interested in cryptocurrencies and, through academic institutions, funded research related to digital assets. In his correspondence, Epstein discussed the nature of Bitcoin and liaised with developers and investors. However, none of the documents prove that he controlled Bitcoin or was involved in its creation.
Epstein’s interest in cryptocurrencies can be explained by a common desire to avoid banking controls and use more autonomous financial instruments.
The documents examined by law enforcement do not contain any documented schemes for cryptocurrency payments for the provision of illegal services, nor any direct confirmation of the existence of a centralised network of such ‘clients’ – the files lack clear details of crypto wallets and there are no recorded instances of services being paid for in cryptocurrency. All financial transactions that could be traced were mostly conducted through traditional banking channels.
Currently, the US Department of Justice has published an archive comprising over 3.5 million pages of documents, 180,000 images, and 2,000 videos. During the searches, numerous photographs of girls were found. According to the Miami Herald, the abuse of minors had been going on for years.
It should be noted that the ‘decryption’ and publication of the materials is a lengthy process, and the information is regularly supplemented and updated; moreover, a mere mention in the documents does not necessarily imply involvement in the crimes.